On February 28, 2017, the SEC’s Division of Economic and Risk Analysis (DERA) and New York University’s Salomon Center for the Study of Financial Institutions will host a dialogue on Securities Crowdfunding in the U.S.  The event, held at the SEC’s headquarters, will include a discussion on the economic rationale and legal framework for securities crowdfunding; a discussion on investor protection and capital formation in securities crowdfunding; and a presentation on the empirical evidence and data on securities crowdfunding.

Welcome remarks will start at 9:15 am.  The event is open to the public and will also be webcast on the SEC’s website.

At the 35th Annual Federal Securities Institute, a representative of the Securities and Exchange Commission shared some market data.

From its effective date in June 2015 through December 2016, there were 171 Regulation A offerings filed. Of these, 76 were Tier 1 offerings and 95 were Tier 2 offerings. The aggregate proceeds sought to be raised in the filed deals was approximately $3 billion. There were 97 offerings qualified. Thus far, $238 million has been reported sold, though more complete data will be available when issuers file their reports in a few months.

From its May 2016 effective date, 163 companies have filed to undertake crowdfunded offerings. The average minimum raise sought is $100,000 and the average maximum raise is $647,000. The average time period has been between four and six months. 28 deals have been completed raising approximately $8.1 milllion. 24 issuers failed to meet the minimum amount sought and withdrew their offerings.

The SEC and the SEC Staff had a busy second half of 2016.  In late 2016, the SEC Staff issued guidance principally in the form of C&DIs on various topics.  Join Morrison & Foerster for our two-part recap of items you may have missed.

Session One
Wednesday, February 8, 2017
11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. ET

During our first session, we will review Regulation A:  what do we know about how the exemption is working?; Regulation Crowdfunding; C&DIs on Regulation Crowdfunding; FINRA crowdfunding enforcement matter; Rule 147/Rule 504; Integration C&DI; C&DIs on Rule 701; and Guidance on Rule 144.


Session Two
Thursday, February 9, 2017
11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. ET

During our second session, we will review C&DIs on Rule 144A, FPIs, and Regulation S.  We also will discuss guidance on Exxon Capital exchange offer representations; guidance on shortened tenders; and recent Trust Indenture Act related court cases.


CLE credit is pending for California and New York.

To register for this teleconference series, or for more information, please click here.

On November 2, 2016, FINRA terminated the FINRA registration for UFP, LLC (“UFP”), making UFP the first crowdfunding portal to be expelled from FINRA.   UFP ran an online funding portal, uFundingPortal.com, where it acted as an intermediary in debt and equity crowdfunding offerings conducted in reliance on SEC Regulation Crowdfunding rules.  FINRA’s investigation into UFP alleged that from May through September 2016, UFP violated various SEC Regulation Crowdfunding rules and FINRA Funding Portal Rules. As a result of FINRA’s investigation, UFP pulled its website and submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (the “AWC”) in order to settle these alleged rule violations with FINRA.  The AWC is available at: http://disciplinaryactions.finra.org/Search/ViewDocument/67004.

FINRA alleged that UFP violated Rule 301(a) and Rule 301(c)(2) under SEC Regulation Crowdfunding.  Rule 301(a) requires funding-portal intermediaries like UFP to have a reasonable basis for believing that issuers using its crowdfunding portal comply with applicable regulatory requirements, and Rule 301(c)(2) requires that access to funding portals be denied to issuers that present the potential for fraud or otherwise raise investor protection concerns. FINRA found UFP to be in violation of Rule 301(a) because 16 of the issuers on UFP’s portal had failed to file certain requisite disclosures with the SEC and, in each case, UFP had reviewed these issuers’ SEC filings and therefore had reason to know that these filings were incomplete.  In addition, FINRA found UFP to be in violation of Rule 301(c)(2) by failing to deny access to its portal when it had a reasonable basis to believe these issuers and/or their offerings presented the potential for fraud. For example, FINRA found that these 16 issuers all had impracticable business models and oversimplified and unrealistic financial forecasts; 13 of these issuers disclosed identical amounts for their funding targets, maximum funding requests, price per share of stock, number of shares to be sold, total number of shares and equity valuation; three of these issuers had identical language in the “Risk Factors” sections of their websites; and two issuers listed identical officers and directors even though they had vastly different business plans.  Additionally, UFP had reason to know that four of these issuers either had officers or directors who owed back taxes or had not filed an annual tax return for 2015.   FINRA also alleged that UFP violated Funding Portal Rule 200(c)(3), which prohibits funding portals from including any issuer communication on its website that it knows or has reason to know contains any untrue statement of material fact or is otherwise false or misleading.

On October 26, 2016, the SEC adopted final rules (1) amending Rule 147 and Rule 504 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), (2) establishing a new Securities Act exemption designated Rule 147A, and (3) repealing Rule 505 under the Securities Act.  Amended Rule 147 and new Rule 147A will take effect on April 20, 2017, amended Rule 504 will take effect on January 20, 2017, and the repeal of Rule 505 will take effect on May 20, 2017.  Amended Rule 147 facilitates offerings relying upon recently adopted intrastate crowdfunding exemptions under state securities laws, new Rule 147A further accommodates offers accessible to out-of-state residents and companies that are incorporated or organized out-of-state, and amended Rule 504 increases the aggregate amount of securities that may be offered and sold in any twelve-month period from $1 million to $5 million and disqualifies certain bad actors from participating in Rule 504 offerings.

For more information regarding amended Rule 147, new Rule 147A and amended Rule 504, read our client alert.

At the American Bar Association’s Fall Meeting, Keith Higgins, Director of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”), gave his last “Dialogue with the Director” given the upcoming change in administration.  Mr. Higgins presented his views on a broad range of areas, including the following:

  • Amended Rule 147 and Rule 504 and new Rule 147A.  The Federal Register should be publishing soon the final rules adopting amended Rule 147 and Rule 504 and new Rule 147A so that the effective dates will be early in 2017.  We have commented on these rules in our client alert, available here.
  • The FAST Act.  All of the required rulemakings related to the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act have been completed.  The SEC must deliver on November 28, 2016 its report to Congress on recommendations to simplify the Regulation S-K disclosure rules.  These recommendations are likely to take into account comments received with respect to the “400 Series” of Regulation S-K.
  • Diversity Disclosures.  The Division completed its disclosure recommendations relating to disclosures regarding board of director diversity.  However, SEC Chair Mary Jo White has noted she does not expect the SEC to act on the recommendations before January 2017.
  • At-the-Market Offerings.  Mr. Higgins noted the Division’s review relating to disclosures available to investors in connection with at-the-market (“ATM”) sales by issuers.  Mr. Higgins indicated that there has been continuing discussion with market participants regarding disclosure practices for plan of distribution sections of ATM prospectuses, including disclosures regarding “negotiated” sales and periodic sales.  Mr. Higgins noted that there may be SEC Staff guidance forthcoming on these types of disclosures.
  • Rule 701 and Form S-8.  Given that companies are staying private longer, the SEC Staff has been receiving more questions on Securities Act Rule 701 and the use of registration statements on Form S-8, and the SEC Staff has issued C&DIs in response.  For more information, see our blog post, available here.
  • Looking into the Future.  Mr. Higgins commented on the provisions of the proposed Financial CHOICE Act (the “CHOICE Act”), which may receive renewed interest and support by the new administration next year.  For a summary of the securities law related provisions of the CHOICE Act, see our client alert, available here.
  • Integration C&DI.  The SEC Staff issued new guidance on Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c) of Regulation D that treats Rule 506(c) offerings as “public offerings” for purposes of analogizing to Securities Act Rule 152.
  • Shareholder Proposals.  Mr. Higgins also addressed a number of shareholder proposal matters and pay ratio guidance.

On November 14, 2016, the SEC hosted a panel discussion entitled the “Impact of Recent Innovation in Capital Formation,” as part of its public forum on financial technology (Fintech) innovation held in Washington, D.C., and webcast over the SEC’s website.  Mr. Sebastian Gomez Abero, Head of the Office of Small Business Policy of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, moderated the panel.

Panelists discussed the relationship between financial innovation and capital formation, the dynamic between Fintech and investor protection, and the risks, challenges and opportunities facing borrowers, lenders, intermediaries and regulators engaged in the online marketplace lending and crowdfunding spaces.  The panelists said that, overall, they see the recent growth in peer-to-peer online lending and crowdfunding technologies as positive developments, particularly in expanding the availability of and access to affordable credit and capital to traditionally underserved markets, including small business owners and entrepreneurs.  Another common theme identified by the panel is the need for greater clarity, standardization and consolidation in the regulatory structure.  A panelist commented that, at the moment, there were about 25 federal agencies involved in consumer finance and much more at the state level, with overlapping jurisdictions.  Oftentimes, borrowers who wish to tap into the online marketplace lending and crowdfunding spaces are confronted with the daunting task of navigating through a complex and overlapping regulatory landscape, with multiple regulators to deal with.  Notwithstanding these challenges, the panel expressed confidence that online marketplace lending and crowdfunding are poised to grow and develop in the coming years.  The SEC has also reported that in less than six months since the regulations became effective, more than 140 companies have started an offering using the new Regulation Crowdfunding.

Earlier today at an open meeting, the SEC adopted final rules regarding intrastate and regional offerings, which closely follow the SEC’s proposed rules issued on October 30, 2015.  The final rules amend Securities Act Rule 147 to facilitate offerings relying upon recently adopted intrastate crowdfunding exemptions under state securities laws.  Rule 147 provides a safe harbor for intrastate offerings exempt from registration pursuant to Securities Act Section 3(a)(11), which exempts any security offered and sold only to persons resident within a single state or territory by an issuer residing or incorporated in and doing business within such state or territory.  As amended, Rule 147 will continue to function as a safe harbor under Section 3(a)(11), though Section 3(a)(11) will still be available as a potential statutory exemption in and of itself.  The final rules also establish a new Securities Act exemption, designated Rule 147A, that further accommodates offers accessible to out-of-state residents and companies that are incorporated or organized out-of-state.  The final rules also amend Rule 504 of Regulation D to (1) increase the aggregate amount of securities that may be offering and sold in any twelve-month period from $1 million to $5 million and (2) disqualify certain bad actors from participating in Rule 504 offerings.  In addition, the final rules repeal Rule 505 of Regulation D, which had provided a safe harbor from registration for securities offered and sold in any twelve-month period from $1 million to $5 million.  The amendments to Rule 147 and Rule 504 are part of the SEC’s broader effort to assist smaller companies with capital formation consistent with other public policy goals, including investor protection.

For more information, read our client alert.

On Wednesday, October 26, 2016, beginning at 10:00 a.m., the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an open meeting at which the Commission will consider the adoption of final rule amendments relating to Securities Act Rule 147 and Rule 505, which would facilitate intrastate and regional securities offerings.  The proposed amendments were well-received by market participants and generated only modest comments.  The open meeting notice also states that the Commission will consider whether to repeal Rule 505.  Rule 505 provides an exemption for sales of up to $5 million of securities in a 12-month period, without the use of general solicitation, to accredited investors and, subject to information requirements, to non-accredited investors.  Presumably, the amendments to Rule 504 would render Rule 505 superfluous.

“Direct-to-consumer” offerings enable companies to raise capital directly from their customers, with or without the use of underwriters or other financial intermediaries. Direct-to-consumer offerings have garnered attention recently given the ability to conduct offerings using a “crowdfunded” approach; however, companies have conducted direct-to-consumer offerings for years. With the amendments to Regulation A (commonly referred to as “Regulation A+”) and the adoption of Regulation Crowdfunding by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), companies have now become more acutely focused on broadening their investor base by soliciting interest in offerings of their securities from their customers. In this alert, we discuss the history of direct-to-consumer offerings, current approaches, the applicable SEC requirements, and considerations for companies undertaking such offerings.

Read our client alert.